Links for Tuesday, July 28, 2020

Notable China news from around the web.

WHAT WEโ€™RE READING:

More important China news and analysis from around the web:

โ€œThe Uyghurs’ suffering deserves targeted solutions, not anti-Chinese posturing,โ€ย writes the scholar James Millward in the Guardian. Noting that what Beijing is doing to the Uyghurs fits two of the five parts of the UN definition of genocide,ย Millward praises international pushback, including from the U.S., but cautions about โ€œpointlessly antagonistic actions against China and the Chinese people,โ€ namely:

โ€ฆbroad tariffs on billions of dollarsโ€™ worth of Chinese goods; using a racist term to refer to COVID-19 rather than collaborating to defeat a global pandemic; cancelling Peace Corpsย and Fulbright exchanges; calling Chinese students and scholars โ€œspiesโ€; threateningย to block CCP membersย and their families (a group estimated at more than 200 million, the vast majority with no role in policy-making); or shutting downย the PRC consulate in Houston, Texas, at short notice.

Millward urges people outside just the U.S. and China to โ€œthink and act with agility to help stop the genocide but also head off a cold war,โ€ to investigate Xinjiang-connected supply chains, to shame and sanction โ€œcorporations and officials linked to the Xinjiang gulag,โ€ and to provide โ€œsupport and legal refuge to Uyghur, Kazakh and other Xinjiang exiles.โ€

  • Worth noting and emphasizing:ย The Trump administration makes no exception to its anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant stances when it comes to Uyghurs. The Wall Street Journal reports todayย that โ€œa few hundred Uyghursโ€ are part of a 340,000-strong backlog of cases in front of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). One Uyghur, Kalbinur Awut, applied for political asylum in the U.S., and her case โ€œhas been pending with USCIS for 1,796 days, not including delays.โ€

Banning Chinese companies is not a viable solutionย to data security problems, writes Financial Times deputy Beijing bureau chief Yuan Yang, in response to the American governmentโ€™s โ€œattempt to kill [Huaweiโ€™s] global telecoms equipment businessโ€ and potential ban on TikTok. She argues:

We cannot hermetically seal ourselves off from China and its companies โ€” nor should we try to. Instead, we need to figure out practical ways to meet a challenge that has been with us since long before the rise of China: our need to coexist in a world with people we donโ€™t trust.

Yang suggests that some of those โ€œpractical waysโ€ to address problems are to increase digital literacy โ€” since โ€œthe most common data leaks donโ€™t stem from the high-tech machinations of the Chinese security services or U.S. companiesโ€ โ€” mandate end-to-end encryption, conduct regularย audits for operators, and increase accountability and transparency for the algorithms that power apps like TikTok.

See also Samm Sacks on The China Project: Banning TikTok is a terrible idea.

IN OTHER NEWS:

BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY:

SCIENCE, HEALTH, AND THE ENVIRONMENT:

POLITICS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS:

SOCIETY AND CULTURE: