Links for Tuesday, December 1, 2020

Notable China news from around the web.

WORTH THINKING ABOUT

Pieces of news or analysis that caught our eye:

When Marxism fails, thereโ€™s always Schmittism: Chang Che writes in the Atlanticย about how the work of the German legal theorist Carl Schmitt โ€” who was a Nazi Party member for three years starting in 1933 โ€” has gained increasing prominence in official thinking in China under Xรญ Jรฌnpรญng ไน ่ฟ‘ๅนณ.

Whereas liberal scholars view the rule of law as the final authority on value conflicts, Schmitt believed that the sovereign should always have the final say. Commitments to the rule for law would only undercut a communityโ€™s decision-making power, and โ€œdeprive state and politics of their specific meaning.โ€ Such a hamstrung state, according to Schmitt, could not protect its own citizens from external enemies.

The Chinese Communist Party gave a โ€œnod to Schmittโ€ in a 2014 white paper on Hong Kong, Che writes, as the paper โ€œclaims that the preservation of sovereignty โ€” of โ€˜one countryโ€™ โ€” must take precedence over civil liberties โ€” of โ€˜two systems.โ€™ Using Schmittโ€™s rationale, [the paper] raises the stakes of inaction in Hong Kong insurmountably high: No longer a liberal transgression, the security law becomes an existential necessity.โ€

Why is the CCP so smitten with Schmitt?ย Che continues:

To some degree, it is a matter of convenience. โ€œSchmitt serves certain purposes that Marxism should have done, but can no longer do,โ€ Haig Patapan, a politics professor at Griffith University in Australia who has written on Schmittโ€™s reception in China, told me. Schmitt gives pro-Beijing scholars an opportunity to anchor the partyโ€™s legitimacy on more primal forces โ€” nationalism and external enemies โ€” rather than the timeworn notion of class struggle.

The increased focus on Schmitt is significant, Che concludes, because it โ€œmarks a move from what had been an illiberalย government in Beijing โ€” one that flouts liberal norms as a matter of convenience โ€” to an anti-liberalย government โ€” one that repudiates liberal norms as a matter of principle.โ€

In other news:

A whistleblower โ€œinside the Chinese healthcare systemโ€ย gave CNN โ€œ117 pages of leaked documentsย from the Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention,โ€ which details some of the challenges and chaos in the early stages of responding to COVID-19.

  • The leak confirms that Chinese officials downplayed the severity of the outbreak early on, but does not significantly change what we already knew about government missteps from reporting in the FT, NYT, WSJ, AP, and Washington Post, as well as by Caixinย and others.

MORE NEWS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY:

SCIENCE, HEALTH, AND THE ENVIRONMENT:

POLITICS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS:

SOCIETY AND CULTURE: