Links for Tuesday, March 9, 2021

Notable China news from around the world.

WORTH THINKING ABOUT

Pieces of news or analysis that caught our eye:

The debate over what to call the atrocities in Xinjiang is the subject of a new report from a think tank in Washington, D.C. that concludes that China has โ€œviolated every single provision in the United Nations’ Genocide Convention,โ€ CNN reports.

We would also note that while most Xinjiang-focused scholars already agreed that China is likely committing several of the five acts specified in the United Nationsโ€™ Genocide Convention โ€” violating any one of the conventionโ€™s provisions is enough to technically qualify as โ€œgenocideโ€ under international law โ€” the first one, โ€œkilling members of the group,โ€ is not well-established as a widespread occurrence in Xinjiang.

  • The Newlines report says on page 5 that there have been โ€œreports of mass deathโ€ in Xinjiang, using the plural, but in its more full explanation on pages 26-27, only mentions โ€œoneโ€ฆreport of mass deaths within an internment camp,โ€ linking to a story from the U.S. government-funded Radio Free Asia from 2019. That report has not been confirmed by other outlets.

This is not to downplay any of the horrors occurring in Xinjiang; The China Project has covered news from the region, and will continue to do so.

But if you are looking for a well-sourced, in-depth and up-to-date read on what life in Xinjiang is like today, in and out of the camps, we recommend instead this piece from the New Yorker: โ€œInside Xinjiang’s Prison State.โ€

MORE NEWS FROM AROUND THE WORLD

BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY:

SCIENCE, HEALTH, AND THE ENVIRONMENT:

POLITICS AND CURRENT AFFAIRS:

SOCIETY AND CULTURE:


Correction: Originally, the “Worth Thinking About” section of this post linked to an article by the Center for Security Policy, which said that the predecessor to the Newlines Institute for Strategy and Policy was linked to the Muslim Brotherhood. We have removed this reference, as the Center for Security Policy is not credible, and its article contained inaccurate information. We apologize for the error.