The rift in Chinese society that should worry Party leaders

Scholar Tanner Greer makes a cogent argument that โ€œthe most dangerous thought in modern Chinaโ€ has nothing to do with Xinjiang, Hong Kong, free speech, human rights, or any number of Western democratic values โ€” and probably not even the more sordid aspects of the Partyโ€™s history, which it works tirelessly to keep hidden. As he lays out on his blog, The Scholarโ€™s Stage:ย 

The fissure that matters in today’s China is the gulf between the worlds of Mรจng WวŽnzhลu ๅญŸๆ™š่ˆŸ and Lว Hรณngyuรกn ๆŽๆดชๅ…ƒ. It is the breach between those who have spent their lives jumping through hoops in chase of a chimera, and those whose only worry is that their family might come down on the wrong side of the next anti-corruption campaign. It is the gap between those who ache for some guarantee that their children will have a place in the race, and those Red few who do not have to bother with running their children in it at all.

Understand: the gap I speak of is not that between the haves and the have-nots, though that is related. It is the void that separates those the Communist system is designed to save from those who it will blindly, indifferently sacrifice.

Meng Wanzhouย is Huaweiโ€™s CFO, who, while detained (and living comfortably) in Vancouver, recently published an open letter lamenting the loss of her erstwhile life of luxury. Li Hongyuanย is a former Huawei employee who was detained for suing the company for an end-of-year bonus he was owed. The โ€œgulfโ€ between their stories enraged the Chinese public, as outlined by Li Yuanย in the New York Timesย (porous paywall). And itโ€™s that gulf, that โ€œfissure in the facade,โ€ which Greer says will โ€œsooner or laterโ€ฆexplode.โ€

โ€”Anthony Tao