Beijing expels three Wall Street Journal reporters

Politics & Current Affairs

wsj

Photo credit: The China Project illustration by Derek Zheng

On February 3, the Wall Street Journal published an opinion piece by Walter Russell Mead with the headline โ€œChina is the real sick man of Asia.โ€ For context on why this headline would be seen as offensive by Chinese people, see this Twitter thread by Financial Times reporter Yuan Yang. ย 

The WSJ is censored in China, but the Chinese foreign ministry said on February 10ย that the headline โ€œhurts the feelings of the Chinese people and [has] roused public anger and condemnation.โ€ The foreign ministry called on the WSJ to issue a public apology and warned, โ€œWe reserve the right to take further measures.โ€

Then, on February 18, the U.S. State Departmentย designated five Chinese state media outletsย as โ€œforeign missions,โ€ essentially treating them as extensions of the Chinese government.

Within hours, Beijing retaliatedย โ€” but used the Walter Russell Mead op-ed as an excuse. Or, at least, that is our interpretation. Writer Eric Fish suggestsย another potential factor โ€” โ€œfanning nationalist anger at Wall Street Journal (and by tacit extension, undermining all โ€˜Western mediaโ€™) then taking decisive action to punish it, might be a winning move for the CCP at the moment.โ€

Three WSJ journalists were given five-day notices to leave the country.ย None of them were involved with the op-ed, but had all written on subjects that the Chinese government would rather not talk about. The Foreign Correspondents Club of China statedย that this was the first outright expulsion of journalists in China since 1998 โ€” though a total of nine have been forced to leave the country since 2013, the others simply did not receive renewals of their visas.

The three journalists, as identified by the WSJ, and some of their recent work, are:

The Chinese foreign ministry claimedย (in English, in Chinese) that the expulsions were a response to โ€œmedia that speak racially discriminatory languages and maliciously slander and attack China.โ€ While the first half of that phrase seems to apply directly to the Mead op-ed, the second half โ€” ๆถๆ„ๆŠน้ป‘ๆ”ปๅ‡ปไธญๅ›ฝ รจyรฌ mว’hฤ“i gลngjฤซ zhลngguรณ โ€” is how Beijing describes a variety of foreign reporting that it finds politically inconvenient. โ€œMaliciously tarnishing Chinaโ€ is also what Chun Han Wong was accused of last Augustย when his visa was not renewed.

In other news of repression of journalists and writers:ย 

  • Popular longtime opinion blog Dร jiฤ ๅคงๅฎถ by Tencent News was suddenly shut downย and had its entire archive of articles removed from the internet. The closure of the blog resulted in an outpouring of shock and sadness online.
  • Two citizen journalists reporting from Wuhan, Fฤng Bฤซn ๆ–นๆ–Œ and Chรฉn Qiลซshรญ ้™ˆ็ง‹ๅฎž, have disappearedย in murky circumstances for more than two weeks. ย 
  • โ€œXว” Zhรฌyว’ngย ่ฎธๅฟ—ๆฐธ, a former law lecturer and founder of the social campaign New Citizens Movement, was taken away by policeโ€ฆwhile he was seeking refuge at the home of a lawyer in the southern city of Guangzhou,โ€ย reports the Guardian. โ€œLaw professor Xu Zhangrunย Xว” Zhฤngrรนn ่ฎธ็ซ ๆถฆ, who also published a public critique of Xi, was placed under house arrest for days and now barred from the internet. ย