China joins massive Asian trade deal, a symbolic step to set standards without the U.S.

Politics & Current Affairs

The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Agreement was signed yesterday, promising to set trading standards for 10 Southeast Asian countries plus China, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, and Japan. The deal is a strategic, but mostly symbolic win for China.

RCEP illustration
Illustration by Derek Zheng

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) announced yesterdayย that a massive free-trade deal, more than eight years in the making, has been signed. The Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Agreement comprises 15 countries: the 10 members of ASEAN, plus Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Japan, and โ€” most importantly โ€” China.

  • RCEP covers โ€œa market of 2.2 billion peopleย with a combined size of $26.2 trillion or 30% of the worldโ€™s GDP.โ€
  • It aims to eliminate tariffsย and quotas for goods, and also encourages firms to invest in the member countries, per ASEAN.

What does the trade pact mean?

China may be the biggest winner, but not exactly for economic reasons โ€” China and ASEAN already built a free-trade areaย more thanย a decade ago. Other members also wonโ€™t see significant economic effects from the deal, as most โ€œalready have equal or better deals with each other,โ€ per Greg Polling, a senior fellow for the Southeast Asia program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

  • The U.S. โ€” Chinaโ€™s primary competitorย in the global economy โ€” is losing โ€œstrategic momentumโ€ by not participating in this trade deal or actively shaping a regional alternative, argues Evan Feigenbaum, vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. โ€œAmerican firms will be active in the region even if Washington is not. But they will adapt to someone elseโ€™s rules.โ€
  • โ€œAsia is increasingly codifyingย its own regional integration in the wake of COVID-19,โ€ adds Yves Tiberghien, a professor at the University of British Columbia.
  • President-Elect Joe Biden could changeย this by reengaging the U.S. in negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) that Trump pulled out of three years ago, the New York Times reports. But โ€œBiden has not said whether he would rejoin the deal โ€” renamed the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership โ€” once he enters office,โ€ and โ€œanalysts say it is unlikely to be a high priority.โ€
  • RCEP is โ€œunambitious in scopeย but marks a win for China and a setback for India and America,โ€ the Economist writes. India, which had pulled outย of RCEP negotiations a year ago, is โ€œparty to very few bilateral trade agreementsโ€ to boost trade in other venues.

Chinese state media celebratedย the propaganda win.

  • A Xinhua commentaryย clearly written with the U.S. in mind said that RCEP โ€œshines rays of hope through the dark clouds of global trade uncertainty,โ€ and represents a choice of โ€œsolidarity and cooperation over conflict and confrontation.โ€
  • The nationalistic Global Times pushed back on a common characterization of RCEP as โ€œChina-led,โ€ย saying that instead, the deal is โ€œwin-win and all-win.โ€
  • An opinion piece in state broadcaster CGTNย hailed RCEP as the result of โ€œwell contemplated diplomacy,โ€ and said that it shows those who advocate โ€œdecouplingโ€ with China โ€œare likely to end up on the outside of the world’s economic gravity.โ€

More to read on RCEP and the future of free trade and China: