Editor’s note for Thursday, March 4, 2021

A note from the editor of today's The China Project Access newsletter.

editor's note for Access newsletter

My thoughts today:

โ€œChinaโ€™s rubber-stamp parliamentโ€ is how Chinaโ€™s annual Two Sessions is often glossed in media reports. I wish I could tell you that it was more nuanced than that, but as government proposals and draft laws are almost never turned down, the clichรฉ remains a good description.

Chinese state media does not agree, however, and this year has found some fancy new ways of referring to what happens in Beijing every March, which provide our words of the day:

Socialist democracy with Chinese characteristics: ไธญๅ›ฝ็‰น่‰ฒ็คพไผšไธปไน‰ๆฐ‘ไธป zhลngguรณ tรจsรจ shรจhuรฌzhว”yรฌ mรญnzhว”

Substantial democracy: ๅฎž่ดจๆฐ‘ไธป shรญzhรฌ mรญnzhว”

Whether you think the Two Sessions are an exercise in democracy or not, weโ€™ll be covering them every day โ€” the proceedings may be predictably boring, but Xรญ Jรฌnpรญng ไน ่ฟ‘ๅนณ and his Communist Party will send some important political messages.

Weโ€™ll be listening, and taking notes.

Itโ€™s Womenโ€™s History Month, and today Iโ€™d like to draw your attention, if you donโ€™t know about it already, to the NรผVoices directory of more than 600 female experts on Greater China in a huge range of fields from history to politics, from Africa-China relations to health policy.

โ€”Jeremy Goldkorn, Editor-in-Chief