Chinese brands and sneaker scalpers seize their moment amid Xinjiang cotton row

Society & Culture

State-supported consumer boycotts of international apparel and shoe brands like Nike and Adidas for their positions on cotton from Xinjiang have generated a craze for Chinese sneaker brands, and online merchants are cashing in.

Li Ning
Weng lei / Reuters

Prices for Chinese-made, limited-edition footwear by domestic sportswear brands like Li-Ning and Anta have gone through the roof in China โ€” thanks to the troubles of international power players such as Nike and Adidas, which have been facing a public backlash for their concerns about forced labor in the Xinjiang region.ย 

Since late March, Li-Ning and Anta have seen a dramatic surge in their popularity and sales, especially among Chinese sneakerheads on the secondary market, who buy and sell high-end kicks as a full-time business.ย 

  • The particular pair that has experienced the wildest price spike is the Way of Wade 4 from Li-Ning. Released in 2016 and limited to only 100 pairs, the sneaker is part of a signature line that Li-Ning created for retired NBA superstar Dwyane Wade.
  • On Poizon, a leading sneaker resale platform in China, a pair of Way of Wade 4s was at one point being offered for around 48,889 yuan ($7,462) โ€” 32 times its original sale price.
  • WOW7 The Moment, another sneaker from the Wade design series, which was originally priced at 1,699 yuan ($260), also recently saw its price climb to a record high of 30,000 yuan ($4,580).
  • Another shoe by Chinese sports apparel manufacturer Anta was listed for 4,599 yuan ($702), a substantial markup from its retail price of 499 yuan ($76).

The renewed interest in purchasing locally made sneakers was partly created by a number of Chinese scalpers, who saw an opportunity to turn quick profits by playing the market after a host of foreign retailers caught flak last month for their reluctance to use cotton from Xinjiang, where China has been accused of running a brutal crackdown on the Uyghur minority group.

  • As international brands like Nike and Adidas continued to face boycott calls, Li-Ning and Anta have benefited from the nationalism-tinged protests by emphasizing their Chinese identity and asserting their stances on Xinjiang cotton.ย 
  • As Chinese consumers piled on foreign sneaker companies, Anta announced its exit from the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI) and vowed to continuously source Xinjiang-origin material. In 2019, the Fujian-based firm became a member of BCI for sustainable cotton production. The global organization suspended licensing of farms in Xinjiang last year due to concerns about the use of forced labor.ย 
  • Li-Ning was a huge supporter of Xinjiang cotton even before the controversy. Many of its clothing items are explicitly labeled as โ€œproducts of Xinjiang cotton.โ€
  • While sneaker culture has been thriving in China for quite some time, local sneakerheads were mostly crazy about foreign products like ultra-rare Jordans and Yeezys. But because general interest in Chinese-made sneakers has exploded โ€” an online poll last month found that more than 60% of Chinese consumers said they would only choose domestic brands after the Xinjiang cotton debacle โ€” scalpers have shifted their focus to Li-Ning and Anta, reselling their shoes with insane price tags to drive up hype and demand.

The craze for trading Chinese-made kicks has provoked price-point exasperation among average consumers, and Chinese state media has expressed serious concern about the situation.

  • State news agency Xinhua wrote in a commentary (in Chinese) that the price hikes were unwise and could result in customers losing trust in Chinese brands. It also pointed out the frenzy was fueled by โ€œa few online marketplacesโ€ trying to capitalize on the sensation.
  • The Peopleโ€™s Daily called for (in Chinese) an immediate stop to the โ€œevil phenomenon,โ€ saying that the scalpers were โ€œconsuming peopleโ€™s patriotic sentiment.โ€
  • In response to the backlash, Poizon released a statement (in Chinese) earlier this week, explaining that it had taken down excessively expensive shoes from its site due to their โ€œhigh price fluctuations.โ€