Editor’s note for Tuesday, April 20, 2021
A note from the editor of today's The China Project Access newsletter.

My thoughts today:
Xรญ Jรฌnpรญng ไน ่ฟๅนณ yesterday visited the prestigious Tsinghua University, where he urged Chinese universities to โproduce inquisitive thinkers who are totally loyal to the Communist Party.โ
Today he gave a speech via video (in Chinese here) at the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA), Chinaโs annual geopolitical schmoozefest and influence operation that takes place on Hainan Island. Foreign guests of note included Appleโs Tim Cook, Teslaโs Elon Musk, Blackstoneโs Stephen Schwarzman, and Bridgewaterโs Ray Dalio.
Xiโs main points seemed aimed at the U.S. and at distinguishing Chinaโs approach to superpowerdom from Americaโs:
We must not let the rules set by one or a few countries be imposed on others, or allow unilateralism pursued by certain countries to set the pace for the whole world. What we need in todayโs world is justice, not hegemonyโฆ
However strong it may grow, China will never seek hegemony, expansion, or a sphere of influence. Nor will China ever engage in an arms race.
Meanwhile, as we noted yesterday, an essay by former premier Wฤn Jiฤbวo ๆธฉๅฎถๅฎ was published last week on page B2 of an obscure newspaper in Macao (in Chinese). It was, per CNN, โostensibly a tribute to his late mother, [but is] what many have interpreted as a coded criticism of Xi: calling for fairness, justice, humanity and liberty, all while remembering a period of history the Communist Party would rather forget.โ
The essay was shared on Chinese social media before being censored (in Chinese), leading to even more speculation about Wenโs motives and what it all means.
My take: Donโt get too excited about Wen Jiabao. He has a history of issuing liberal-sounding statements that may be intended to hedge his place in history, but donโt really mean a lot. Even when he actually held a position of real power, Wen was fond of making speeches that seemed to indicate a politically reformist bent, but resulted in nothing. And he was much more powerful than Lว Kรจqiรกng ๆๅ ๅผบ, the man who now has Wenโs old job, but really just gets to play Xiโs chief lackey.
Two examples of Wenโs honeyed words while he was Chinaโs second most powerful man:
- In 2008, CNN host Fareed Zakaria interviewed Wen and asked him about democracy and the lessons of 1989. Wen answered that China needed to โgradually improve the democratic election systemโฆbuild an independent and just judicial systemโฆ[and subject the government] to oversight by the peopleโฆAnd particularlyโฆoversight by the news media.โ
- In 2009, Wen said, โI have always believed that the public has the right to know what its government is doing and thinking about, and the right to criticize and make comments on government policies.โ
And what about the mother that provides the reason for Wenโs essay? She is Yรกng Zhรฌyรบn ๆจๅฟไบ, who according to a 2012 New York Times investigation by David Barboza โbecame outright richโ while her son was premier.
Our words of the day are phrases from Xiโs Boao speech:
The world wants justice, not hegemonyโฆChina will never seek / proclaim hegemony
ไธ็่ฆๅ ฌ้๏ผไธ่ฆ้ธ้โฆไธญๅฝๆฐธ่ฟไธ็งฐ้ธ
shรฌjiรจ yร o gลngdร o, bรบ yร o bร dร oโฆzhลngguรณ yวngyuวn bรน chฤngbร
โJeremy Goldkorn, Editor-in-Chief