Editor’s note for Tuesday, April 20, 2021

A note from the editor of today's The China Project Access newsletter.

editor's note for Access newsletter

My thoughts today:

Xรญ Jรฌnpรญng ไน ่ฟ‘ๅนณ yesterday visited the prestigious Tsinghua University, where he urged Chinese universities to โ€œproduce inquisitive thinkers who are totally loyal to the Communist Party.โ€

Today he gave a speech via video (in Chinese here) at the Boao Forum for Asia (BFA), Chinaโ€™s annual geopolitical schmoozefest and influence operation that takes place on Hainan Island. Foreign guests of note included Appleโ€™s Tim Cook, Teslaโ€™s Elon Musk, Blackstoneโ€™s Stephen Schwarzman, and Bridgewaterโ€™s Ray Dalio.

Xiโ€™s main points seemed aimed at the U.S. and at distinguishing Chinaโ€™s approach to superpowerdom from Americaโ€™s:

We must not let the rules set by one or a few countries be imposed on others, or allow unilateralism pursued by certain countries to set the pace for the whole world. What we need in todayโ€™s world is justice, not hegemonyโ€ฆ

However strong it may grow, China will never seek hegemony, expansion, or a sphere of influence. Nor will China ever engage in an arms race.

Meanwhile, as we noted yesterday, an essay by former premier Wฤ“n JiฤbวŽo ๆธฉๅฎถๅฎ was published last week on page B2 of an obscure newspaper in Macao (in Chinese). It was, per CNN, โ€œostensibly a tribute to his late mother, [but is] what many have interpreted as a coded criticism of Xi: calling for fairness, justice, humanity and liberty, all while remembering a period of history the Communist Party would rather forget.โ€

The essay was shared on Chinese social media before being censored (in Chinese), leading to even more speculation about Wenโ€™s motives and what it all means.

My take: Donโ€™t get too excited about Wen Jiabao. He has a history of issuing liberal-sounding statements that may be intended to hedge his place in history, but donโ€™t really mean a lot. Even when he actually held a position of real power, Wen was fond of making speeches that seemed to indicate a politically reformist bent, but resulted in nothing. And he was much more powerful than Lว Kรจqiรกng ๆŽๅ…‹ๅผบ, the man who now has Wenโ€™s old job, but really just gets to play Xiโ€™s chief lackey.

Two examples of Wenโ€™s honeyed words while he was Chinaโ€™s second most powerful man:

  • In 2008, CNN host Fareed Zakaria interviewed Wen and asked him about democracy and the lessons of 1989. Wen answered that China needed to โ€œgradually improve the democratic election systemโ€ฆbuild an independent and just judicial systemโ€ฆ[and subject the government] to oversight by the peopleโ€ฆAnd particularlyโ€ฆoversight by the news media.โ€
  • In 2009, Wen said, โ€œI have always believed that the public has the right to know what its government is doing and thinking about, and the right to criticize and make comments on government policies.โ€

And what about the mother that provides the reason for Wenโ€™s essay? She is Yรกng Zhรฌyรบn ๆจๅฟ—ไบ‘, who according to a 2012 New York Times investigation by David Barboza โ€œbecame outright richโ€ while her son was premier.

Our words of the day are phrases from Xiโ€™s Boao speech:

The world wants justice, not hegemonyโ€ฆChina will never seek / proclaim hegemony

ไธ–็•Œ่ฆๅ…ฌ้“๏ผŒไธ่ฆ้œธ้“โ€ฆไธญๅ›ฝๆฐธ่ฟœไธ็งฐ้œธ

shรฌjiรจ yร o gลngdร o, bรบ yร o bร dร oโ€ฆzhลngguรณ yว’ngyuวŽn bรน chฤ“ngbร 

โ€”Jeremy Goldkorn, Editor-in-Chief