China-India border dispute erupts in melee, with 20 Indian soldiers perishing in sub-zero temperatures
The latest China-India border standoff has taken an unexpected violent turn, days after a deescalation was apparent, and midway through a 10-day period of ground-level military talks.ย
Indian and Chinese troops have disengaged at the Galwan area where 20 Indian Army personnel were killed in a violent clash in eastern Ladakh’s Galwan Valley on Monday night, the Indian Army saidโฆ
Initially, the army said one officer and two soldiers were killed. Later in the night, an army statement said 17 more soldiers who “were were critically injured in the line of duty at the standoff location and exposed to sub-zero temperatures in the high altitude terrain have succumbed to their injuries, taking the total that were killed in action to 20.”
“Indian and Chinese troops have disengaged at the Galwan area where they had earlier clashed on the night of 15/16 June 2020,” it said, adding that the “Indian Army is firmly committed to protect the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the nation.”
Multiple sources in government and military establishments told PTI that the fierce clashes continued for several hours. The sources said the Chinese side also suffered “proportionate casualties” but chose not to speculate on the numbers.
The casualties came from โviolent hand-to-hand scuffles,โ rather than shots being fired, according to an Indian army official anonymously quoted by AFP.ย
China did not officially confirm any deaths, either Indian or Chinese, though Global Times editor Hรบ Xฤซjรฌn ่ก้ก่ฟ tweeted, โBased on what I know, Chinese side also suffered casualties in the Galwan Valley physical clash.โย
Hu being who he is, he followed up that cryptic message with saber rattling: โI want to tell the Indian side, donโt be arrogant and misread Chinaโs restraint as being weak. China doesnโt want to have a clash with India, but we donโt fear it.โย
The Chinese Foreign Ministry had the same message, delivered by the similarly nationalistic spokesperson Zhร o Lรฌjiฤn ่ตต็ซๅ, per AFP: โ[Indian troops] crossed the border line twice…provoking and attacking Chinese personnel, resulting in serious physical confrontation between border forces on the two sidesโฆ We again solemnly request that India follows the relevant attitude and restrains its frontline troops.โ Interestingly, this message appears to have been scrubbed from the Foreign Ministry press conference transcript for June 16.ย
Though itโs hard to know exactly what happened in the Himalayas last night, it is certainly the deadliest day on the China-India border in more than half a century. And though Hu Xijin attempted to frame Beijingโs reluctance to publish casualty numbers as an act of โgoodwill,โ Taylor Fravel, a scholar of Chinaโs military, says it is very much standard practice for Beijing to wait years or even decades to release casualty figures publicly.ย
For more, see:
- Indian Army says 20 soldiers killed in clash with Chinese troops in the Galwan area / The Hindu
- India, China troops clash at Himalayan border, ‘casualties on both sides’ / Reuters
- India-China border standoff: 20 Indian soldiers die in clashes with Chinese troops / Washington Post (porous paywall)
- 20 Indian soldiers killed in deadly border clash with China / NYT (porous paywall)
- For China and India, a border dispute that never ended / NYT (porous paywall)
- Line of Actual Control | India-China: The line of actual contest / The Hindu
- M. Taylor Fravel on Twitter: โThe PLA’s Western Command has issued a statement on the Galwan River clash. A rough translation is attached (sharing, not endorsing). A few things to note:โ
- Ananth Krishnan on Twitter: โCommon thread in both MEA and PLA statements: Both sides had agreement to disengage at June 6 corps commander talks, in process of implementing that understanding something went terribly wrong, now each accusing other of going back on June 6 understanding, taking unilateral actionโ
- Ananth Krishnan on Twitter: โThis is bizarre, even by this newspaper’s standards: Global Times quotes โa source familiar with the matterโ as saying Monday’s clash was a rogue attack by Indian โfrontlineโ troops โmost likely not approved by their superiorsโโ