China discloses four military fatalities from India border clash last June

Politics & Current Affairs

The exceedingly rare admission of military combat fatalities from Beijing comes after eight months of silence. It appears to be a recognition that tensions with India are successfully deescalating, after an agreement to disengage at one of the many border conflict areas, Pangong Lake.

Illustration by Derek Zheng

Eight months after a bloody clash on the India-China border, Beijing has made an exceedingly rare admission of military combat fatalities.

  • Four soldiers in the Peopleโ€™s Liberation Army (PLA) who were stationed in the Karakoram Mountains died in the June 2020 hand-to-hand brawl, the PLA Daily said in an article today (in Chinese), honoring them as martyrs.
  • โ€œThe responsibility [for conflict] lies entirely with the Indian side,โ€ the Chinese foreign ministry said today (Chinese, English), when asked about the article. Of course, India has always maintained the exact opposite.
  • See also Global Times coverage of the news in English.

Why admit fatalities now?

The Chinese foreign ministry says that the admission of fatalities came after โ€œthe Indian side has repeatedly sensationalized and hyped up this incident with the casualties and distorted the truth to mislead the international public opinion.โ€

  • It could indeed have been a reaction to comments by Lieutenant General YK Joshi, Indiaโ€™s northern army commander, who this week claimed that โ€œIndian troops had observed โ€˜more than 60โ€™ fatal or non-fatal casualties on the Chinese side after the clash,โ€ the Financial Times notes.
  • However, the timing comes right after an agreement to disengage at one of the many border conflict areas, Pangong Lake.

In effect, the PLA Daily article is a recognition that the border conflict is successfully deescalating, at least at the moment. If tensions were escalating, it likely would not have been published.

  • โ€œBack in June, China-Indian relations were intense. But now the China-India border conflict has eased,โ€ Wang Dehua of the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies told the FT.

Is the number credible?

Ananth Krishnan, a veteran journalist of India-China affairs, writes that while we have no way of verifying the number of Chinese fatalities, the single-digit number โ€œsounds more or less plausibleโ€ and happens to be โ€œsimilar to the number initially reported in the Indian media in June.โ€ A separate number of 45, Krishnan comments, has โ€œsomewhat questionable provenance.โ€

  • Taylor Fravel, a scholar of Chinaโ€™s military, notes that there could have been more fatalities, as the PLA Daily article โ€œwas not a complete account of [the] clash or designed to provide a full accounting of all casualties.โ€

See also, on the easing in India-China tensions: