Trade war, day 55: China only third priority after NAFTA, EU

Politics & Current Affairs

Today, U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin confirmed what was already pretty obvious: The Trump administration is in absolutely no rushย to resolve its ongoing trade confrontation with China.

  • โ€œWeโ€™ve put [Washingtonโ€™s foreign trade objectives] in three categories:ย the first was really [the North American Free Trade Agreement, or Nafta]; the second is dealing with the EU, which we are making progress on; and the third is China,โ€ Mnuchin said, the SCMP reports.
  • The thinking behind the U.S. sideโ€™s comfortย in a drawn-out approach โ€” that the Chinese economy will be, or already is, collapsing under pressure from the U.S. โ€” was explained in more detail in our trade war roundup yesterday.
  • The Chinese thinking, which similarlyย leads officials in China to take a patient approach at this time, is that the U.S. is using the trade war as a tool to contain Chinaโ€™s economic rise and is therefore not willing to compromise. This was also explained in our roundup yesterday.
  • More confirmation that this is what Chinese officials think can be found in the Peopleโ€™s Daily today: Noted China-watcher Bill Bishop points outย (paywall)ย a pieceย (in Chinese)ย by Long Guoqiang, vice president of the Development Research Center of the State Council โ€” effectively, Long is the equivalent of a high-ranking Cabinet official.
  • Long argues that โ€œstrategic containmentโ€ย (ๆˆ˜็•ฅ้ๅˆถ zhร nlรผรจ รจzhรฌ) is one of the primary American goals with the trade war โ€” along with โ€œinterests extortionโ€ (ๅˆฉ็›Šๆ•ฒ่ฏˆ lรฌyรฌ qiฤozhร ), basically threatening trade wars or actually going through with them to force the opening of markets, and โ€œmodel beatdownโ€ (ๆจกๅผๆ‰“ๅŽ‹ mรณshรฌ dวŽyฤ), or attacking the Chinese โ€œstate capitalismโ€ model of development to preserve American hegemony.

In other trade war and related news:


Previously inย The China Projectโ€™s trade war coverage:

Trade war, day 54: Trump says โ€˜not the right time to talkโ€™ with China, as trade conflict looks to extend to at least November