Editor’s note for Tuesday, November 10, 2020
A note from the editor of today's The China Project Access newsletter.

My thoughts today:
Itโs a week after the surprise suspensionย of Alibaba affiliate Ant Groupโs dual listing on Hong Kong and Shanghai stock markets, which was to have been the worldโs largest IPO. As we noted in our report: โTencent can expect scrutiny, too.โ
Today brings news that Chinese regulators are taking the countryโs entire tech sector to task, with newly drafted antitrust regulations that will probably bring scrutiny to Tencent, Meituan, JD.com, and also to Ant Group parent company Alibaba and many other tech companies. The government probably has popular support โ the suspension of Ant Groupโs IPO was cheered by many Chinese people on social media, some of whom described the company as a โloan shark.โ
Canada-China relations, as you know, are not copacetic right now. This is the result of some remarkably rapid changes โ the two countries formalized diplomatic ties in 1970, and relations have generally been good since then. Many of the factors that have led to tensions have really been beyond Canadaโs control, such as the Mรจng Wวnzhลu ๅญๆ่ affairย (Canada arrested her, but it was under treaty obligation). ย
To reflect on the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between Canada and China, the Canadian International Council is publishing a series of articles on the relationship. Hereโs the third in the series, on Human Rights, by Pitman B. Potter, who recommends โselective engagementโ which โoffers a useful alternative to relational discourses that either subordinate frank discussion on Chinaโs abuses of human rights and rule of law to the broad imperative of maintaining friendly relations or else reject the possibility of positive relations altogether.โ
Finally, a correction:ย In our recent storyย on Chinaโs new COVID-19 entry bans on citizens of certain countries, we originally stated that Chinaโs travel ban in March barred โeven permanent residency holders from entering.โ This is incorrect, as the ban applied to those holding temporary residence permits, but did not affect those with a Permanent Resident Certificate.
Our word of the dayย is Antitrust guidelines for the [internet] platform economy: ๅ ณไบๅนณๅฐ็ปๆต้ขๅ็ๅๅๆญๆๅ guฤnyรบ pรญngtรกi jฤซngjรฌ lวngyรน de fวn lวngduร n zhวnรกn.
โJeremy Goldkorn, Editor-in-Chief






