The phase one U.S.-China trade deal signing show

Politics & Current Affairs

Trump got his purchase commitments, and China successfully avoided making serious concessions on industrial subsidies, changes to regulatory laws that go beyond high-level commitments, and any commitment to stop cyber espionage of any kind.

u.s. president donald trump and chinese vice premier liu he show off a signed phase one trade deal between the u.s. and china at the white house after a ceremony on january 15, 2020
Photo credit: The top image of the Xinhua report (English, Chinese) on the signing of the U.S.-China phase one trade deal today in Washington, D.C.

A signing ceremony for a phase one U.S.-China trade deal was held at the White House today. Chinese Vice-Premier Liรบ Hรจ ๅˆ˜้นค attended and put his name on paper alongside Trumpโ€™s, sparing Xรญ Jรฌnpรญng ไน ่ฟ‘ๅนณ any personal embarrassmentย if the deal in China is ever perceived to be a failure or show weakness. ย 

Liu He spent most of the ceremony standing awkwardlyย behind Trump as the president turned the event into a self-congratulatory awards show. For over half an hour, Trump rambled and thanked dozens of โ€œfantasticโ€ people in the audience by name for largely unspecified, โ€œgreatโ€ jobs that they had done.

Many of those in the room seemed to have been invited purely because they were allies of the president, not because they had anything to do with trade with China. A few of them were associated with private companies that likely have large stakes in the Chinese market. Henry Kissinger, sitting in the front row right in front of Trump, was not among the many dozens of people he thanked by name.

Perhaps Trumpโ€™s only remark worth notingย is: โ€œWe donโ€™t expect to have a Phase Three.โ€ This means that all the most difficult issues will have to be resolved in a phase two agreement, which would probably not come before the November elections, if the excruciatingly long process to get to phase one is any indication.

From the self-congratulatory tones of Trump, U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, and U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, as well as the amicable talk from Liu He and Chinese ambassador to the U.S. Cuฤซ TiฤnkวŽi ๅด”ๅคฉๅ‡ฏ about their satisfaction with the โ€œmutually beneficial win-win agreement,โ€ it sounds like all negotiating parties are happy to kick the phase two can down the road for now.

Click hereย to view the official White House video recording of the event.

Whatโ€™s in the agreement?

Right as the signing ceremony ended, the Office of the United States Trade Representative released a noticeย of an โ€œEconomic and Trade Agreement Between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Peopleโ€™s Republic of China,โ€ which includes the English-language text of the agreement as a 96-page PDF.

A separate page of 16 fact sheetsย explains the parts of the deal concerning everything from intellectual property to pet food, and from agricultural biotechnology to financial services. The White House also released a bullet point summaryย of what it considers to be the highlights of the deal.

There are chapters on intellectual propertyย and technology transfer, as well as financial services, currency, and dispute resolution โ€” though for these, as we pointed out yesterday, the devil is in the detailsย and much depends on the as-yet-unreleased Chinese version of the text.

The most important partย of the agreement appears to be Chinaโ€™s commitment to purchase $200 billion in American goods over the next two years, as had been reported previously. On pages 6-3 and 6-4ย of the text, there is a table detailing the components of that $200 billion, which we have republished below:

trade deal 200 billion calculation cropped

Despite Trumpโ€™s focusย on โ€œGreat Patriot Farmers,โ€ the largest beneficiaries appear to be American manufacturers of industrial goods, at least according to the numbers provided. Energy exports come in second, services in third, and agriculture comes in as the smallest basket of exports to be promoted.

What do the Chinese get from the agreement?

No new tariffs, most importantly.ย The expectation of a deal in December led to Trump canceling planned tariff increases in that month, and the signing now means that Trump is less likely to increase tariffs later in 2020.

China has also successfully avoidedย making serious concessions on industrial subsidies, changes to regulatory laws that go beyond high-level commitments, and any commitment to stop cyber espionage of any kind.

Here is a selection of initial reactions and analysis from media outlets, trade experts, and other notable people:

  • The agreement โ€œhelps calm relations but failsย to address issues at the heart of the trade war,โ€ according to a summary by Politico.
  • โ€œThe pledges [on technology transfer]ย are much more detailed than conditions Beijing has agreed to in the past. However, the section doesnโ€™t require China to change any law or regulation to fulfill its obligations,โ€ the Wall Street Journal points outย (paywall).
  • โ€œThis is an encouraging first stepย that should benefit many of our members,โ€ U.S.-China Business Council president Craig Allen wrote in a statement. โ€œBut the work isnโ€™t done yet. Implementation of the agreement will be critically important. Moreover, the phase one agreement should be swiftly followed by continued phase two negotiations on remaining issues.โ€
  • โ€œThere is really almost nothing newย in the currency provisions,โ€ said Brad Setser, a former U.S. Treasury Department official now at the Council on Foreign Relations. โ€œChina has agreed to disclose material that it is already disclosing,โ€ he added.
  • Joe Biden called the trade deal โ€œvague, weak,โ€ย Bloomberg reportsย (porous paywall). The former vice president, and the leading contender for the Democratic nomination to face off with Trump in the general election, said that it โ€œwonโ€™t actually resolve the real issues at the heart of the dispute, including industrial subsidies, support for state-owned enterprises, cybertheft, and other predatory practices in trade and technology.โ€

โ€”Lucas Niewenhuis