Trade war, day 112: U.S. refuses to negotiate before China shows its hand

Politics & Current Affairs

As has been the case for about two months now, despite a glimmer of hopeย for negotiations that was quickly dashedย in mid-September, American and Chinese officials are at an impasse over the trade war. The Wall Street Journal has new detailsย (paywall)ย on the current situation:

  • Since mid-September, Beijing has asked to negotiate, โ€œincluding asking U.S. Treasury Undersecretary David Malpass to resume talks.โ€
  • Malpass โ€œdeclined โ€” with the backing of the White House trade team โ€” until the Chinese present a formal offer.โ€
  • That โ€œformal offerโ€ย is expected to be based on an eight-point list of demands that the Trump administration gave Beijing way back in May, โ€œranging from halving the $376 billion trade deficit to curtailing much of Chinaโ€™s subsidies for high-tech industries.โ€
  • China divided that eight-point listย into 142 more individual points, and in August told the U.S. that 122 of these were negotiable โ€” half immediately, and half over time โ€” but that the last 20 were off-limits for national security or other reasons. China did not specify which points were non-negotiable, and the U.S. wants to know.
  • Beijing doesnโ€™t want to tellย Washington exactly what it is willing to compromise on for two reasons: โ€œFirst, it would reveal their negotiating position. Second, Beijing fears that Mr. Trump could make any offer public in a tweet or statement as a way to lock in any concessions by China.โ€
  • China wants assurancesย that tariffs will be reduced if they give a specific list. The U.S. says it will not negotiate or budge on tariffs if it does not see the list first.

If you are looking to catch up on how this chasm of trust between the two governments came to be, the Washington Post has an excellent article for you: How the U.S. and China misread the signals in the trade war. A few key points among many in the story:

  • At least three times,ย in Beijingโ€™s eyes, Donald Trump has unexpectedly backtracked on tentative trade-related agreements or activities that cabinet-level officials were working on.
  • โ€œAs many as 10 Americansย can claim to be speaking for President Xi to President Trump and vice versa,โ€ but โ€œthe messages were not internally consistent,โ€ according to the Hudson Centerโ€™s Michael Pillsbury, who himself has played a role as an intermediary, according to Wall Street Journal reporting.
  • A group of Chinese researchers were stopped and searched when they landed in San Francisco earlier this year, in a previously unreported incident. These included some senior members of the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, an influential think tank in Beijing, leading China to think the security measures were politically motivated.
  • โ€œThe Chinese are becoming convincedย that the U.S. is an active enemy and needs to be treated as such,โ€ says former diplomat Chas Freeman, Jr., who was recently interviewed on the Sinica Podcast.
  • โ€œFrustration has turned into exasperation. This is a geopolitical earthquake in the makingย and the implications are huge,โ€ Freeman adds.

More U.S.-China and trade war news:


Previously inย The China Projectโ€™s trade war coverage:

Trade war, day 111: Companies buckle up for supply chain shifts